Same way you will have to take a new DNA-C device and use it exclusively for at least 3 months and then try an older/mainstream device to even remotely pick up the differences. And when you do stumble on a new device where they fumbled the setup and the performance is weaker, you'll notice it immediately and can adjust it accordingly. If you have been using mainstream mods and chipsets and gone from early day devices to modern devices, you'll pick up that the performance has become better with every release. The best thing about non-DNA mods is that, if they die, you can replace them with that new mod you had your eye on, and you will still come out financially better off. Most also do temp control well these days. The majority of hobby vapers don't use temp control, and almost all new mods are fine in wattage or power mode. You just don't expect them to fail because of their legendary reliability. I think that whenever anyone has a problem with a DNA mod they almost always complain about it. IMO this does not necessarily reflect badly on the DNA boards. You fairly often see reliability issues with DNA mods, particularly with regard to screens. When it comes to reliability there will always be a debate. Nowadays most mods fire quickly, do temp control well and are accurate or accurate enough. They were accurate, reliable, fast-hitting, and did temp control well. In the "old" days DNA chips were undoubtedly the best available. The only time I would buy another DNA mod is if I really, really, really like the design of the mod itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |